Market Pricing
The contract price is set by the market and reflects the combined expectations of participants.
Prediction markets are moving into the mainstream. For the betting industry, they are a new product format, a new competitor and a new regulatory question: where does the derivatives market end and sports betting begin?
The contract price is set by the market and reflects the combined expectations of participants.
Product quality depends on market depth, spreads, market makers and the ability to exit a position.
In the US, event contracts are developing within the federal derivatives framework while facing challenges from individual states.
For sportsbook companies, the 2027 question is whether to compete, integrate, act as an intermediary or build their own infrastructure.
Rising volumes, more contracts and new entrants have made prediction markets a strategic issue for betting companies.
Combined trading volume for Kalshi and Polymarket in 2025, according to KPMG.
KPMG · 2026Monthly notional trading on prediction markets in March 2026, according to KPMG.
KPMG · 2026Event-contract listings in 2025, versus fewer than 150 a year from 2021 to 2024.
KPMG Regulatory Insights · 2026The CFTC launched a new consultation and rulemaking cycle around prediction markets and event contracts.
CFTC · 2026The basic mechanics are straightforward: the market trades a contract on an event outcome, the price moves with participants’ expectations, and settlement follows once the outcome is known.
A clearly resolvable question is defined: will the event happen or not?
A participant buys a YES or NO position at a price that moves with the market.
The position can be bought or sold before settlement; its price changes with new information and demand.
After the event, the contract is resolved using a predefined settlement source and resolution rules.
The contract closes according to its specification. A precise settlement methodology is one of the foundations of market integrity.
The overlap is most visible in sports event contracts, where the customer sees something close to a traditional bet even though the infrastructure and regulatory framework may be different.
The breadth of categories is what makes the format interesting: one market-infrastructure layer can support very different types of events.
Match outcomes, totals, spreads, player statistics, futures and multi-event contracts.
Elections, control of legislative chambers, nominations and other events with a defined outcome.
Central-bank decisions, macroeconomic indicators and economic events.
Awards, media charts and cultural events where the result can be objectively verified.
Corporate events, financial milestones and market indicators where the product structure is permitted.
The key question for 2027 is which new categories can pass product review and regulatory scrutiny.
The regulatory picture remains fluid. These are the main federal steps shaping the context for 2027.
The Commission withdrew its previous event-contract proposal and said it intended to build a new framework.
Policy resetThe Division of Market Oversight reminded DCMs of core principles, product-submission requirements, market surveillance and considerations specific to sports-related contracts.
DCM obligationsThe CFTC requested comments on prediction markets, the public interest, event contracts, inside information and related issues.
ANPRA structured process was proposed for evaluating contracts involving gaming and other activities enumerated in law.
RulemakingCFTC staff separately stressed the quality of contract specifications, settlement methodology, data sources and product documentation.
Product governanceA new advisory focused on self-certification requirements for liquidity, market-making and trading-incentive programmes.
Liquidity governanceSports event contracts make the distinction between a sportsbook and a prediction market especially visible: user journeys are converging faster than regulatory regimes.
Not every company needs to build its own exchange. The right route depends on the level of control required, regulatory appetite, capital and time to market.
Connect to existing infrastructure with limited control over contracts.
Suitable for companies that want to test demand, UX and cross-sell before building a full exchange stack.
The brand becomes the interface between the customer and registered market infrastructure.
A compromise between speed to market and the ability to shape the product independently.
A deeper role in customer infrastructure and intermediation, but with substantially greater compliance overhead.
This model requires strong operational maturity and a capable risk function.
Owning exchange infrastructure gives control over contract design, pricing architecture, data and market rules.
This is no longer an add-on betting product; it is a regulated market business in its own right.
Control of the clearing and settlement layer can form part of a fully vertically integrated model.
The most demanding route for companies that want to own not only the interface but also critical market infrastructure.
A polished interface can be copied. A deep market is harder to replicate. The tighter the spread, deeper the book and more reliable the execution, the more useful the market price and the stronger the product.
As prediction markets grow, surveillance, inside information, settlement integrity and conflicts management move to the centre of the operating model.
Controls need to identify trading by people who can directly or indirectly influence an outcome or who hold material non-public information.
Market surveillance needs to account for spoofing, coordinated trading and other forms of price-discovery manipulation.
The result source, fallback rules and treatment of disputed events should be defined before trading begins.
Market makers, affiliates, event participants and platform operators require clear access, disclosure and control rules.
A prediction market changes more than the back end. It changes the customer’s mental model: instead of selecting a bet, the user holds a market position that can be opened, increased, reduced or closed.
64¢ is easy to read as a market-implied probability of roughly 64%, although the actual price also reflects market structure, fees and liquidity.
The experience is closer to trading: a user can enter at one price and exit before settlement at another.
A “What will happen?” navigation model creates a different discovery layer from a traditional sportsbook organised around leagues and matches.
Instead of a collection of independent bets, the product can show positions, unrealised P&L and exposure by theme.
Prediction-market economics differ from a traditional sportsbook. Comparing GGR and trading volume alone is not enough.
Transaction, trading and clearing fees can become the primary monetisation model for an exchange.
Market depth affects spreads, execution, retention and the ability to scale new contracts.
Market prices create an information layer that can be valuable for media, research and B2B distribution.
For established consumer brands, prediction products can become a new engagement layer, but they require careful compliance design.
The hardest prediction-market risks sit at the intersection of regulation, market integrity, liquidity and consumer protection.
| Risk | Level | Why it matters | What to control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory uncertainty | High | Federal rules continue to evolve; individual states are challenging some sports products. | Jurisdiction, legal strategy, product approvals |
| Market integrity | High | Inside information and the ability to influence outcomes can undermine confidence in the market. | Surveillance, access controls, investigations |
| Liquidity | High | Without sufficient market depth, the user experience deteriorates quickly. | Market makers, incentives, spreads, depth |
| Settlement disputes | Medium | An ambiguous outcome becomes an operational and reputational risk. | Terms, data sources, fallback rules |
| Consumer protection | High | Customers may perceive sports contracts in much the same way as betting. | Disclosures, suitability, responsible-use controls |
| Tax & reporting | Medium | Event-contract classification affects reporting and customer experience. | Tax treatment, statements, withholding |
These are Betting Trends editorial scenarios, not probability forecasts. The actual market may combine elements of all three.
Sportsbooks and prediction markets remain parallel categories with different audiences and regulatory perimeters.
Large consumer brands begin to offer both formats, while sportsbook and market-trading interfaces gradually converge.
Federal-state conflicts produce a clearer boundary between permitted event markets and gaming-like products.
The strategic decision should start not with “how quickly can we launch?” but with the role prediction markets are meant to play in the business portfolio.
Factual data is kept separate from editorial scenarios. Regulatory information reflects the sources available as of 11 September 2026 and may change.
DCM obligations, core principles, product listings and sports-related event contracts.
NPRM on contracts involving enumerated activities, including gaming.
Market volumes, entry models, DCM/IB/FCM routes and strategic trade-offs.
Growth in event-contract listings and the regulatory context.
Enforcement practice involving misuse of non-public information and fraud.